FrontierHarness Eval
Same model, 12 harness configurations, up to 17.5x cost difference
FrontierHarness Eval compares coding-agent harnesses on identical software engineering tasks using the same model and runtime. Across 12 configurations of 9 harnesses, including Codex, Claude Code and OpenCode, pass rates were similar but cost per task varied up to 17.5x. First shared by its maker on Show HN: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49538490
✨ The overview, FAQ and details below were drafted by AI from the product's own website and haven't been reviewed by the maker yet. Are you the maker? Claim this listing to review and edit them.
Overview
Who is it for?
Engineers choosing or building a coding-agent harness.
Problem
It's hard to tell how much of an agent's cost and quality comes from the harness rather than the model.
Solution
A controlled evaluation where every run uses the same model, hardware and fresh checkpoint, so only the harness changes.
What makes it unique
All 360 trials start from the same fresh checkpoint restore to avoid warm-cache bias, and you can run it on your own harness.
FrontierHarness Eval FAQ
Which model was used?
Every run used Kimi K3, executed on Runta with identical CPU, memory and disk.
Can I evaluate my own harness?
Yes. There's an agent skill and a manual walkthrough in the GitHub repo; it needs Node 18+, jq and an authenticated Runta CLI.
Details
- Pricing
- Open Source
- Categories
- Coding & Dev ToolsResearch & Data
- Built for
- DevelopersResearchers
- Platforms
- WebCLI
Compare FrontierHarness Eval
Hunted by AI Launch Team
Discussion (0)
Sign in to join the discussion.
