Geiger vs Masala (formerly Panel)
Both are AI Agents tools. Both are open source.
Grok| Geiger | Masala (formerly Panel) | |
|---|---|---|
| Tagline | See every AI agent on your machine and what it can touch | A research workspace where the agent can build its own panes |
| Pricing | Open Source | Open Source |
| Categories | AI Agents, Coding & Dev Tools | Research & Data, AI Agents |
| Built for | Developers | Researchers |
| Platforms | CLI | Web |
| Tech stack | Node.js | Node.js, Python |
| Alternative to | — | — |
| AI Launch upvotes | ▲ 0 | ▲ 0 |
| Hacker News | Y▲ 49 on HN | Y▲ 54 on HN |
| Launched | 2026-09-24 | 2026-10-01 |
Overview
Who it's for
Geiger
Developers and IT teams who want to know what AI tooling is installed and what it can access.Masala (formerly Panel)
Researchers who read papers, analyze data and want an agent working in the same workspace.Problem
Geiger
AI agents and plugins can run commands, read files and hold credentials, but they're configured in dotfiles nobody checks.Masala (formerly Panel)
Research work is spread across chat, PDF readers, notebooks and files, so an assistant only sees part of it.Solution
Geiger
One scan that finds agent configs across ecosystems, labels their exposure, redacts credentials and suggests fixes.Masala (formerly Panel)
One local workspace where the agent can read your files and build its own panes and modules, such as a literature review.What makes it unique
Geiger
Zero dependencies and read-only: it writes nothing unless you ask for a JSON report.Masala (formerly Panel)
The agent can create custom viewers and apps on the fly, and everything stays in local folders.